The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Shaffer
No. 010480Supreme Court of Virginia
010480 Commonwealth v. Shaffer 03/01/2002 A person whose operator's license was revoked under then-existing habitual offender provisions in 1997, and who waited until late in 1999 to file a petition for review…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010480 Commonwealth v. Shaffer 03/01/2002 A person whose operator's license was revoked under then-existing habitual offender pro…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 1, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010480 Commonwealth v. Shaffer 03/01/2002 A person whose operator's license was revoked under then-existing habitual offender provisions in 1997, and who waited until late in 1999 to file a petition for review, was not entitled, after repeal of § 46.2-352(B), to a post-deprivation review in order to satisfy his due process rights. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and final judgment is entered dismissing this petition for review.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
010480 Commonwealth v. Shaffer 03/01/2002 A person whose operator's license was revoked under then-existing habitual offender provisions in 1997, and who waited until late in 1999 to file a petition for review, was not entitled, after repeal of § 46.2-352(B), to a post-deprivation review in order to satisfy his due process rights. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and final judgment is entered dismissing this petition for review.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, dismissing.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links