The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Haas v. Lee
010310 Haas v. Lee 03/01/2002 The circuit court properly dismissed a petition for writ of habeas corpus because it was not filed timely pursuant to Code § 8.01- 654(A)(2), which became effective July 1, 1998. …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010310 Haas v. Lee 03/01/2002 The circuit court properly dismissed a petition for writ of habeas corpus because it was not filed …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 1, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
010310 Haas v. Lee 03/01/2002 The circuit court properly dismissed a petition for writ of habeas corpus because it was not filed timely pursuant to Code § 8.01- 654(A)(2), which became effective July 1, 1998. The statute of limitations contained in that section bars the petition because petitioner was provided a reasonable opportunity to enforce and protect his right to file his habeas corpus petition.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
010310 Haas v. Lee 03/01/2002 The circuit court properly dismissed a petition for writ of habeas corpus because it was not filed timely pursuant to Code § 8.01- 654(A)(2), which became effective July 1, 1998. The statute of limitations contained in that section bars the petition because petitioner was provided a reasonable opportunity to enforce and protect his right to file his habeas corpus petition.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
