The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
City of Richmond v. Holt
011742 City of Richmond v. Holt 06/07/2002 In a personal injury action, the trial court correctly held that the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive notice to a municipality of a defect in a munic…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011742 City of Richmond v. Holt 06/07/2002 In a personal injury action, the trial court correctly held that the evidence was suff…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 7, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
011742 City of Richmond v. Holt 06/07/2002 In a personal injury action, the trial court correctly held that the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive notice to a municipality of a defect in a municipal right-of-way adjoining a public street. That judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
011742 City of Richmond v. Holt 06/07/2002 In a personal injury action, the trial court correctly held that the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive notice to a municipality of a defect in a municipal right-of-way adjoining a public street. That judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
