The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hospital
011557 Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hospital 06/07/2002 In a medical malpractice action, the trial court erred in striking the plaintiffs' evidence on the ground that the proof was insufficient to establish neg…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011557 Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hospital 06/07/2002 In a medical malpractice action, the trial court erred in striking the pla…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 7, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
011557 Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hospital 06/07/2002 In a medical malpractice action, the trial court erred in striking the plaintiffs' evidence on the ground that the proof was insufficient to establish negligence or proximate causation, and in entering summary judgment for the defendant hospital. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
011557 Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hospital 06/07/2002 In a medical malpractice action, the trial court erred in striking the plaintiffs' evidence on the ground that the proof was insufficient to establish negligence or proximate causation, and in entering summary judgment for the defendant hospital. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
