The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission v. Lewis
No. 020696Supreme Court of Virginia
020696 Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission v. Lewis 09/13/2002 Clear and convincing evidence is found to support a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission that a juvenile and domestic relati…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020696 Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission v. Lewis 09/13/2002 Clear and convincing evidence is found to support a complaint b…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 13, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020696 Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission v. Lewis 09/13/2002 Clear and convincing evidence is found to support a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission that a juvenile and domestic relations district court judge engaged in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice by enforcing an order that had been stayed by the circuit court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the judge be, and he hereby is, censured.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Stayed
The court's record, as written
020696 Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission v. Lewis 09/13/2002 Clear and convincing evidence is found to support a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission that a juvenile and domestic relations district court judge engaged in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice by enforcing an order that had been stayed by the circuit court. Accordingly, it is ordered that the judge be, and he hereby is, censured.
Outcome words in this text: stayed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links