The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
American Communications Network Inc. v. Williams
012699 American Communications Network Inc. v. Williams 09/13/2002 In a defamation case, the circuit court erred in confirming a jury verdict for plaintiff because the statements in the alleged defamatory publ…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
012699 American Communications Network Inc. v. Williams 09/13/2002 In a defamation case, the circuit court erred in confirming a …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 13, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
012699 American Communications Network Inc. v. Williams 09/13/2002 In a defamation case, the circuit court erred in confirming a jury verdict for plaintiff because the statements in the alleged defamatory publication are either opinion which is not actionable, or have been admitted as true. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and final judgment is entered in favor of the defendants.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
012699 American Communications Network Inc. v. Williams 09/13/2002 In a defamation case, the circuit court erred in confirming a jury verdict for plaintiff because the statements in the alleged defamatory publication are either opinion which is not actionable, or have been admitted as true. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and final judgment is entered in favor of the defendants.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
