The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Carraway v. Hill
No. 020487Supreme Court of Virginia
020487 Carraway v. Hill 01/10/2003 In a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief in which the plaintiff alleged that a city treasurer violated the Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices A…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020487 Carraway v. Hill 01/10/2003 In a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief in which the plaintiff alleged that a city…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 10, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020487 Carraway v. Hill 01/10/2003 In a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief in which the plaintiff alleged that a city treasurer violated the Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act by disclosing employment information, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and final judgment is entered in favor of the defendant because the Act does not apply to constitutional officers.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
020487 Carraway v. Hill 01/10/2003 In a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief in which the plaintiff alleged that a city treasurer violated the Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act by disclosing employment information, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and final judgment is entered in favor of the defendant because the Act does not apply to constitutional officers.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links