The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
In Re: Iris Lynn Phillips
No. 020479Supreme Court of Virginia
020479 In Re: Iris Lynn Phillips 01/10/2003 Code § 53.1-231.2, which allows a convicted felon to seek circuit court approval of a petition for restoration of eligibility to register to vote, is not unconstitut…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020479 In Re: Iris Lynn Phillips 01/10/2003 Code § 53.1-231.2, which allows a convicted felon to seek circuit court approval of a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 10, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020479 In Re: Iris Lynn Phillips 01/10/2003 Code § 53.1-231.2, which allows a convicted felon to seek circuit court approval of a petition for restoration of eligibility to register to vote, is not unconstitutional, and petitioner's application is remanded for consideration in conformance with its provisions.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Remanded
The court's record, as written
020479 In Re: Iris Lynn Phillips 01/10/2003 Code § 53.1-231.2, which allows a convicted felon to seek circuit court approval of a petition for restoration of eligibility to register to vote, is not unconstitutional, and petitioner's application is remanded for consideration in conformance with its provisions.
Outcome words in this text: remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links