The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Northern Va. Electric v. VEPCO
No. 021998Supreme Court of Virginia
021998 Northern Va. Electric v. VEPCO 02/28/2003 According the presumption of correctness to a decision of the State Corporation Commission as to which of two utilities is the proper provider of electric power…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
021998 Northern Va. Electric v. VEPCO 02/28/2003 According the presumption of correctness to a decision of the State Corporation …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 28, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
021998 Northern Va. Electric v. VEPCO 02/28/2003 According the presumption of correctness to a decision of the State Corporation Commission as to which of two utilities is the proper provider of electric power service to a customer whose property lies partly within the certificated service territory of each utility, the order of the Commission is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
021998 Northern Va. Electric v. VEPCO 02/28/2003 According the presumption of correctness to a decision of the State Corporation Commission as to which of two utilities is the proper provider of electric power service to a customer whose property lies partly within the certificated service territory of each utility, the order of the Commission is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links