The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Simon v. Forer
No. 021627Supreme Court of Virginia
021627 Simon v. Forer 04/17/2003 The circuit court correctly sustained pleas of the statute of limitations when the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action nonsuited her case and then refiled the action afte…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
021627 Simon v. Forer 04/17/2003 The circuit court correctly sustained pleas of the statute of limitations when the plaintiff in …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 17, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
021627 Simon v. Forer 04/17/2003 The circuit court correctly sustained pleas of the statute of limitations when the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action nonsuited her case and then refiled the action after the expiration of the six-month period provided by the nonsuit tolling provisions, and more than two years after the cause of action originally accrued. Under Code § 8.01-229(E) the original statute of limitations was not tolled by the pendency of the nonsuited action. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
021627 Simon v. Forer 04/17/2003 The circuit court correctly sustained pleas of the statute of limitations when the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action nonsuited her case and then refiled the action after the expiration of the six-month period provided by the nonsuit tolling provisions, and more than two years after the cause of action originally accrued. Under Code § 8.01-229(E) the original statute of limitations was not tolled by the pendency of the nonsuited action. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links