The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Yellow Freight v. Courtaulds
022244 Yellow Freight v. Courtaulds 06/06/2003 Before an employer petitioned to enforce subrogation rights in an employee's personal injury action, the employee entered a settlement absolutely releasing the to…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022244 Yellow Freight v. Courtaulds 06/06/2003 Before an employer petitioned to enforce subrogation rights in an employee's perso…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 6, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
022244 Yellow Freight v. Courtaulds 06/06/2003 Before an employer petitioned to enforce subrogation rights in an employee's personal injury action, the employee entered a settlement absolutely releasing the tortfeasor from liability. Although the employee's motion for judgment was still pending, he no longer had a right of recovery. The employer's petition was filed prior to a verdict, but its right of subrogation was no longer enforceable. The judgment of the trial court denying the employer's petition is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDenied
The court's record, as written
022244 Yellow Freight v. Courtaulds 06/06/2003 Before an employer petitioned to enforce subrogation rights in an employee's personal injury action, the employee entered a settlement absolutely releasing the tortfeasor from liability. Although the employee's motion for judgment was still pending, he no longer had a right of recovery. The employer's petition was filed prior to a verdict, but its right of subrogation was no longer enforceable. The judgment of the trial court denying the employer's petition is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: denying, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
