The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Lackman v. Long & Foster Real Estate
No. 021985Supreme Court of Virginia
021985 Lackman v. Long & Foster Real Estate 06/06/2003 The trial court did not err in rejecting contentions that an arbitration award should be vacated because it was procured by fraud, because the arbitrators…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
021985 Lackman v. Long & Foster Real Estate 06/06/2003 The trial court did not err in rejecting contentions that an arbitration a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 6, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
021985 Lackman v. Long & Foster Real Estate 06/06/2003 The trial court did not err in rejecting contentions that an arbitration award should be vacated because it was procured by fraud, because the arbitrators engaged in misconduct, or because the arbitrators exceeded their powers. Nor did it not err in striking a count which invoked the trial court's equity powers to enjoin enforcement of the arbitration award based on equitable defenses of fraud, estoppel, and unclean hands. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
021985 Lackman v. Long & Foster Real Estate 06/06/2003 The trial court did not err in rejecting contentions that an arbitration award should be vacated because it was procured by fraud, because the arbitrators engaged in misconduct, or because the arbitrators exceeded their powers. Nor did it not err in striking a count which invoked the trial court's equity powers to enjoin enforcement of the arbitration award based on equitable defenses of fraud, estoppel, and unclean hands. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links