The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Tanner v. State Corporation Commission
No. 020938Supreme Court of Virginia
020938 Tanner v. State Corporation Commission 06/06/2003 Upon a petition for rehearing filed by the State Corporation Commission, a prior decision in this appeal, which construed various provisions of the Virg…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020938 Tanner v. State Corporation Commission 06/06/2003 Upon a petition for rehearing filed by the State Corporation Commission,…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 6, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020938 Tanner v. State Corporation Commission 06/06/2003 Upon a petition for rehearing filed by the State Corporation Commission, a prior decision in this appeal, which construed various provisions of the Virginia Securities Act, is modified. Securities issued pursuant to federal Rule 504 Regulation D under the authority of § 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 are not "covered securities" and, therefore, must be registered under Virginia Code § 13.1-507. See Record No. 020938, Tanner v. State Corporation Commission dated January 10, 2003
Open court document ↗Docket entry
020938 Tanner v. State Corporation Commission 01/10/2003 In a review of a finding of the State Corporation Commission that the defendants violated certain sections of the Virginia Securities Act, it is determined that certain of the instruments sold by the defendants were securities required to be registered with the Commission, but that others were not. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The proceeding is remanded to the Commission for reconsideration of penalties in the light of these holdings. (Revised 3/05/03) See Record No. 020938, Tanner v. State Corporation Commission dated June 6, 2003
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
020938 Tanner v. State Corporation Commission 01/10/2003 In a review of a finding of the State Corporation Commission that the defendants violated certain sections of the Virginia Securities Act, it is determined that certain of the instruments sold by the defendants were securities required to be registered with the Commission, but that others were not. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The proceeding is remanded to the Commission for reconsideration of penalties in the light of these holdings. (Revised 3/05/03) See Record No. 020938, Tanner v. State Corporation Commission dated June 6, 2003
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links