The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Buchanan v. Buchanan
022351 Buchanan v. Buchanan 09/12/2003 In an appeal from consolidated divorce and fraudulent conveyance proceedings, the wife was properly permitted to pursue payment from the husband under the fraudulent conv…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022351 Buchanan v. Buchanan 09/12/2003 In an appeal from consolidated divorce and fraudulent conveyance proceedings, the wife was…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 12, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
022351 Buchanan v. Buchanan 09/12/2003 In an appeal from consolidated divorce and fraudulent conveyance proceedings, the wife was properly permitted to pursue payment from the husband under the fraudulent conveyance statute, and the trial court's orders directing that a special commissioner hold certain funds did not create constructive trusts. An issue regarding attorneys' fees is moot. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
022351 Buchanan v. Buchanan 09/12/2003 In an appeal from consolidated divorce and fraudulent conveyance proceedings, the wife was properly permitted to pursue payment from the husband under the fraudulent conveyance statute, and the trial court's orders directing that a special commissioner hold certain funds did not create constructive trusts. An issue regarding attorneys' fees is moot. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
