The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Nuckles
No. 022776Supreme Court of Virginia
022776 Commonwealth v. Nuckles 10/31/2003 The Court of Appeals erred reversing the conviction of a defendant charged with grand larceny based upon the Commonwealth's failure to prove that the party from whom t…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022776 Commonwealth v. Nuckles 10/31/2003 The Court of Appeals erred reversing the conviction of a defendant charged with grand l…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- October 31, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
022776 Commonwealth v. Nuckles 10/31/2003 The Court of Appeals erred reversing the conviction of a defendant charged with grand larceny based upon the Commonwealth's failure to prove that the party from whom the property was taken was a corporation as stated in the indictment. The corporate status of the victim was not necessary to identify it, or to establish an element of the offense. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and defendant's conviction is reinstated.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
022776 Commonwealth v. Nuckles 10/31/2003 The Court of Appeals erred reversing the conviction of a defendant charged with grand larceny based upon the Commonwealth's failure to prove that the party from whom the property was taken was a corporation as stated in the indictment. The corporate status of the victim was not necessary to identify it, or to establish an element of the offense. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and defendant's conviction is reinstated.
Outcome words in this text: reversing, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links