The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son
022543 Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son 10/31/2003 Because removal of an action from state court to federal court effects a transfer of the entire case, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from di…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022543 Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son 10/31/2003 Because removal of an action from state court to federal court effects a trans…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- October 31, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
022543 Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son 10/31/2003 Because removal of an action from state court to federal court effects a transfer of the entire case, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from dismissal of a claim filed in Virginia circuit court under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, but which the trial court dismissed prior to removal of the action. The appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
022543 Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son 10/31/2003 Because removal of an action from state court to federal court effects a transfer of the entire case, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from dismissal of a claim filed in Virginia circuit court under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, but which the trial court dismissed prior to removal of the action. The appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
