The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Minor
No. 030401Supreme Court of Virginia
030401 Commonwealth v. Minor 01/16/2004 The trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for separate trials of indictments for offenses against three victims occurring on three different …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
030401 Commonwealth v. Minor 01/16/2004 The trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for separate trials…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 16, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
030401 Commonwealth v. Minor 01/16/2004 The trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for separate trials of indictments for offenses against three victims occurring on three different dates. In this case, evidence of the other crimes was not relevant to the only contested issue, whether each victim consented to sexual intercourse. The judgment of the Court of Appeals reversing defendant's convictions is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedDenied
The court's record, as written
030401 Commonwealth v. Minor 01/16/2004 The trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for separate trials of indictments for offenses against three victims occurring on three different dates. In this case, evidence of the other crimes was not relevant to the only contested issue, whether each victim consented to sexual intercourse. The judgment of the Court of Appeals reversing defendant's convictions is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: denying, reversing, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links