The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
National Housing v. Acordia of Virginia
No. 030269Supreme Court of Virginia
030269 National Housing v. Acordia of Virginia 01/16/2004 In a suit by a builder against an insurance agency alleging negligent failure to list the builder as a named insured under a builder's risk insurance p…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
030269 National Housing v. Acordia of Virginia 01/16/2004 In a suit by a builder against an insurance agency alleging negligent f…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 16, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
030269 National Housing v. Acordia of Virginia 01/16/2004 In a suit by a builder against an insurance agency alleging negligent failure to list the builder as a named insured under a builder's risk insurance policy, the trial court correctly concluded that the builder could not recover damages because the policy would not have covered the loss actually suffered, mitigation expenses arising from the builder's use of defective or deficient materials or designs. The judgment of the trial court for the defendant insurance agency is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
030269 National Housing v. Acordia of Virginia 01/16/2004 In a suit by a builder against an insurance agency alleging negligent failure to list the builder as a named insured under a builder's risk insurance policy, the trial court correctly concluded that the builder could not recover damages because the policy would not have covered the loss actually suffered, mitigation expenses arising from the builder's use of defective or deficient materials or designs. The judgment of the trial court for the defendant insurance agency is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links