The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Green v. Goodman-Gable-Gould Co.
032106 Green v. Goodman-Gable-Gould Co. 06/10/2004 The circuit court erred in going forward with trial of a declaratory judgment proceeding because the relief requested was a determination of a disputed issue …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
032106 Green v. Goodman-Gable-Gould Co. 06/10/2004 The circuit court erred in going forward with trial of a declaratory judgment …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 10, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
032106 Green v. Goodman-Gable-Gould Co. 06/10/2004 The circuit court erred in going forward with trial of a declaratory judgment proceeding because the relief requested was a determination of a disputed issue rather than an adjudication of the parties' rights, and should have been litigated in a breach of contract action. The judgment is reversed and the case is dismissed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
032106 Green v. Goodman-Gable-Gould Co. 06/10/2004 The circuit court erred in going forward with trial of a declaratory judgment proceeding because the relief requested was a determination of a disputed issue rather than an adjudication of the parties' rights, and should have been litigated in a breach of contract action. The judgment is reversed and the case is dismissed.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
