The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Lofton Ridge LLC v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.
No. 032716Supreme Court of Virginia
032716 Lofton Ridge LLC v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co. 09/17/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice, based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel, plaintiff's suit for declaratory and injunctive r…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
032716 Lofton Ridge LLC v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co. 09/17/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice, based on the …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 17, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
032716 Lofton Ridge LLC v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co. 09/17/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice, based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel, plaintiff's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief concerning an easement across land owned by the defendant, where the parties in plaintiff's separate action against its attorneys and land surveyor were not the same as the parties in the present action. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDismissed
The court's record, as written
032716 Lofton Ridge LLC v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co. 09/17/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice, based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel, plaintiff's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief concerning an easement across land owned by the defendant, where the parties in plaintiff's separate action against its attorneys and land surveyor were not the same as the parties in the present action. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links