The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Billups v. Carter
No. 040268Supreme Court of Virginia
040268 Billups v. Carter 11/05/2004 In two related actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging assault and battery by a prison employee who demanded unconsented sexual conduct, the trial court erred in sustaining …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
040268 Billups v. Carter 11/05/2004 In two related actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging assault and battery by a prison employ…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
040268 Billups v. Carter 11/05/2004 In two related actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging assault and battery by a prison employee who demanded unconsented sexual conduct, the trial court erred in sustaining the defendants' demurrers, pleas and motions to dismiss, dismissing the actions on statute of limitations and exhaustion of administrative remedies grounds, and denying a plaintiff's motion to add the Commonwealth as a party defendant. The final orders in both cases are reversed and the cases are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDismissedDenied
The court's record, as written
040268 Billups v. Carter 11/05/2004 In two related actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging assault and battery by a prison employee who demanded unconsented sexual conduct, the trial court erred in sustaining the defendants' demurrers, pleas and motions to dismiss, dismissing the actions on statute of limitations and exhaustion of administrative remedies grounds, and denying a plaintiff's motion to add the Commonwealth as a party defendant. The final orders in both cases are reversed and the cases are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, denying, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links