The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
McCloskey v. Kane
040264 McCloskey v. Kane 11/05/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing a wrongful death action against an emergency medical care provider at a state mental hospital based upon the doctrine of sovereign immuni…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
040264 McCloskey v. Kane 11/05/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing a wrongful death action against an emergency medical care…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
040264 McCloskey v. Kane 11/05/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing a wrongful death action against an emergency medical care provider at a state mental hospital based upon the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Commonwealth's interest and involvement in the defendant doctor's functions was slight and its control limited. Therefore, defendant was not entitled to the protection of the doctrine of sovereign immunity from liability for his alleged negligent acts in treating the decedent, and the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant's plea of sovereign immunity. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDismissed
The court's record, as written
040264 McCloskey v. Kane 11/05/2004 The trial court erred in dismissing a wrongful death action against an emergency medical care provider at a state mental hospital based upon the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Commonwealth's interest and involvement in the defendant doctor's functions was slight and its control limited. Therefore, defendant was not entitled to the protection of the doctrine of sovereign immunity from liability for his alleged negligent acts in treating the decedent, and the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant's plea of sovereign immunity. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
