The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
032674 Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. 11/05/2004 Several contemporaneously executed contracts relating to the acquisition of a funeral home business are treated as integrated in determining the enforceability …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
032674 Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. 11/05/2004 Several contemporaneously executed contracts relating to the acquisition of a fu…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
032674 Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. 11/05/2004 Several contemporaneously executed contracts relating to the acquisition of a funeral home business are treated as integrated in determining the enforceability of various provisions in the contracts after one party's default. The noncompetition provisions in a business management agreement and restrictive covenants in a related lease were unenforceable by a party which had defaulted on its payment obligations in the transaction. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and final judgment is entered.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmed
The court's record, as written
032674 Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. 11/05/2004 Several contemporaneously executed contracts relating to the acquisition of a funeral home business are treated as integrated in determining the enforceability of various provisions in the contracts after one party's default. The noncompetition provisions in a business management agreement and restrictive covenants in a related lease were unenforceable by a party which had defaulted on its payment obligations in the transaction. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and final judgment is entered.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
