The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Halifax Corporation v. Wachovia Bank
032444 Halifax Corporation v. Wachovia Bank 11/05/2004 In a case seeking to impose liability upon a bank relating to embezzlement of an account holder's corporate funds by its own comptroller, the trial court …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
032444 Halifax Corporation v. Wachovia Bank 11/05/2004 In a case seeking to impose liability upon a bank relating to embezzlement…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
032444 Halifax Corporation v. Wachovia Bank 11/05/2004 In a case seeking to impose liability upon a bank relating to embezzlement of an account holder's corporate funds by its own comptroller, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendant bank because Code § 8.3A-406 does not create an affirmative cause of action, the plaintiff's common law claim for conversion has been displaced by Code § 8.3A-420(a), and plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action for aiding and abetting the embezzler's breach of fiduciary duty, assuming such an action exists. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedGranted
The court's record, as written
032444 Halifax Corporation v. Wachovia Bank 11/05/2004 In a case seeking to impose liability upon a bank relating to embezzlement of an account holder's corporate funds by its own comptroller, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendant bank because Code § 8.3A-406 does not create an affirmative cause of action, the plaintiff's common law claim for conversion has been displaced by Code § 8.3A-420(a), and plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action for aiding and abetting the embezzler's breach of fiduciary duty, assuming such an action exists. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: granting, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
