The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Viney v. Commonwealth
041338 Viney v. Commonwealth 03/03/2005 The evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction on two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child in violation of Code § 18.2-370, where the defe…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
041338 Viney v. Commonwealth 03/03/2005 The evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction on two counts of taking…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 3, 2005
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
041338 Viney v. Commonwealth 03/03/2005 The evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction on two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child in violation of Code § 18.2-370, where the defendant's eye contact with the victims, his glance in the direction of his groin, and his conduct subsequent thereto established the lascivious intent required by the statute. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding his convictions is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
041338 Viney v. Commonwealth 03/03/2005 The evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction on two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child in violation of Code § 18.2-370, where the defendant's eye contact with the victims, his glance in the direction of his groin, and his conduct subsequent thereto established the lascivious intent required by the statute. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding his convictions is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
