The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Green v. Ingram
No. 040480Supreme Court of Virginia
040480 Green v. Ingram 03/03/2005 (Revised 03/04/2005) In a wrongful death case, the trial court erred in granting a motion to strike the plaintiff's evidence as it applied to the claim of gross negligence. Ho…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
040480 Green v. Ingram 03/03/2005 (Revised 03/04/2005) In a wrongful death case, the trial court erred in granting a motion to st…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 3, 2005
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
040480 Green v. Ingram 03/03/2005 (Revised 03/04/2005) In a wrongful death case, the trial court erred in granting a motion to strike the plaintiff's evidence as it applied to the claim of gross negligence. However, the trial court did not err in granting the motion to strike the plaintiff's evidence as it applied to willful and wanton conduct and a claim for punitive damages. The case is remanded for a new trial on the issue of gross negligence.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
RemandedGranted
The court's record, as written
040480 Green v. Ingram 03/03/2005 (Revised 03/04/2005) In a wrongful death case, the trial court erred in granting a motion to strike the plaintiff's evidence as it applied to the claim of gross negligence. However, the trial court did not err in granting the motion to strike the plaintiff's evidence as it applied to willful and wanton conduct and a claim for punitive damages. The case is remanded for a new trial on the issue of gross negligence.
Outcome words in this text: granting, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links