The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth
042196 Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth 11/04/2005 In a dispute over construction of a reservoir, Code § 62.1-44.29 waives sovereign immunity for judicial review of Water Control Board actions. T…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
042196 Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth 11/04/2005 In a dispute over construction of a reservoir, Code § 62.1-44.29…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 4, 2005
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
042196 Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth 11/04/2005 In a dispute over construction of a reservoir, Code § 62.1-44.29 waives sovereign immunity for judicial review of Water Control Board actions. The Board properly applied Code § 62.1-44.15:5(C) and the judgment under the Administrative Process Act is affirmed. On separate claims transferred from the Court of Appeals, that portion of the circuit court's judgment holding that a particular Treaty is Virginia law is affirmed. The circuit court's judgment that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the separate Treaty claims is reversed, and those claims are remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
042196 Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth 11/04/2005 In a dispute over construction of a reservoir, Code § 62.1-44.29 waives sovereign immunity for judicial review of Water Control Board actions. The Board properly applied Code § 62.1-44.15:5(C) and the judgment under the Administrative Process Act is affirmed. On separate claims transferred from the Court of Appeals, that portion of the circuit court's judgment holding that a particular Treaty is Virginia law is affirmed. The circuit court's judgment that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the separate Treaty claims is reversed, and those claims are remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
