The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Elliott
No. 051990Supreme Court of Virginia
051990 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Elliott 06/08/2006 Upon consideration of a complaint filed by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission of Virginia presenting seven charges of misconduct by a sitti…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
051990 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Elliott 06/08/2006 Upon consideration of a complaint filed by the Judicial Inquiry and…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
051990 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Elliott 06/08/2006 Upon consideration of a complaint filed by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission of Virginia presenting seven charges of misconduct by a sitting judge, it is held that the complaint is not properly before the Court. Because the judge had previously accepted the Commission's oral offer to enter into a detailed supervision agreement in lieu of having a formal complaint filed against him, he had begun to comply with the terms of such offer, and he had not violated those terms, the agreement was binding and the judge was entitled to its benefit. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
051990 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Elliott 06/08/2006 Upon consideration of a complaint filed by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission of Virginia presenting seven charges of misconduct by a sitting judge, it is held that the complaint is not properly before the Court. Because the judge had previously accepted the Commission's oral offer to enter into a detailed supervision agreement in lieu of having a formal complaint filed against him, he had begun to comply with the terms of such offer, and he had not violated those terms, the agreement was binding and the judge was entitled to its benefit. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links