The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Shutler v. Augusta Health Care for Women
051852 Shutler v. Augusta Health Care for Women 06/08/2006 In a patient's medical negligence suit against a physician and his employer based on vicarious liability, the trial court erred in granting the employ…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
051852 Shutler v. Augusta Health Care for Women 06/08/2006 In a patient's medical negligence suit against a physician and his emp…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
051852 Shutler v. Augusta Health Care for Women 06/08/2006 In a patient's medical negligence suit against a physician and his employer based on vicarious liability, the trial court erred in granting the employer's motion for summary judgment. Dismissal of claims against the physician with prejudice did not amount to an adjudication on the merits in the physician's favor and, therefore, did not operate to exonerate the employer as a matter of law, where the plain language of the dismissal order permitted the patient's vicarious liability claims to proceed against the employer. The trial court's judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedGranted
The court's record, as written
051852 Shutler v. Augusta Health Care for Women 06/08/2006 In a patient's medical negligence suit against a physician and his employer based on vicarious liability, the trial court erred in granting the employer's motion for summary judgment. Dismissal of claims against the physician with prejudice did not amount to an adjudication on the merits in the physician's favor and, therefore, did not operate to exonerate the employer as a matter of law, where the plain language of the dismissal order permitted the patient's vicarious liability claims to proceed against the employer. The trial court's judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: granting, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
