The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Norfolk Redevelopment v. C and C Real Estate
No. 051708Supreme Court of Virginia
051708 Norfolk Redevelopment v. C and C Real Estate 06/08/2006 Concerning allegedly blighted property condemned and acquired pursuant to a housing authority's conservation plan, the circuit court erred in conc…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
051708 Norfolk Redevelopment v. C and C Real Estate 06/08/2006 Concerning allegedly blighted property condemned and acquired purs…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
051708 Norfolk Redevelopment v. C and C Real Estate 06/08/2006 Concerning allegedly blighted property condemned and acquired pursuant to a housing authority's conservation plan, the circuit court erred in concluding that the condemnation violated due process, but did not err in holding that Code § 36-49.2 does not prohibit property acquisition for industrial purposes, that certain language in the plan was overbroad and did not allow acquisition under Code § 36-50.1(4), and that the plan required notice and an opportunity to correct deficiencies to be provided prior to condemnation. Because such notice was not provided, dismissal of the condemnation proceeding was not erroneous. The judgment…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links