The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Janvier v. Arminio
052231 Janvier v. Arminio 09/15/2006 In a medical malpractice action, an order granting the plaintiff a second nonsuit without prejudice pursuant to Code § 8.01-380(B) was not void ab initio due to a failure t…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052231 Janvier v. Arminio 09/15/2006 In a medical malpractice action, an order granting the plaintiff a second nonsuit without pr…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 15, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
052231 Janvier v. Arminio 09/15/2006 In a medical malpractice action, an order granting the plaintiff a second nonsuit without prejudice pursuant to Code § 8.01-380(B) was not void ab initio due to a failure to give notice to the named defendants, who had not yet been served. Since the order was not void, upon a proper finding that the second nonsuit order did not result from fraud, the trial court had no authority to vacate the second nonsuit order after it became final 21 days following entry. The action, re-filed within six months of the entry of the second nonsuit order, was timely. Rulings of the trial court are reversed in part and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedGranted
The court's record, as written
052231 Janvier v. Arminio 09/15/2006 In a medical malpractice action, an order granting the plaintiff a second nonsuit without prejudice pursuant to Code § 8.01-380(B) was not void ab initio due to a failure to give notice to the named defendants, who had not yet been served. Since the order was not void, upon a proper finding that the second nonsuit order did not result from fraud, the trial court had no authority to vacate the second nonsuit order after it became final 21 days following entry. The action, re-filed within six months of the entry of the second nonsuit order, was timely. Rulings of the trial court are reversed in part and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: granting, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
