The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Green v. Virginia State Bar
060558 Green v. Virginia State Bar 11/03/2006 In remanded proceedings concerning imposition of an appropriate sanction for an attorney's violation of Rules 1.3(a) and 8.4(b) of the Virginia Rules of Profession…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060558 Green v. Virginia State Bar 11/03/2006 In remanded proceedings concerning imposition of an appropriate sanction for an att…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 3, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
060558 Green v. Virginia State Bar 11/03/2006 In remanded proceedings concerning imposition of an appropriate sanction for an attorney's violation of Rules 1.3(a) and 8.4(b) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board did not err in conducting the proceedings via telephonic conference call, but abused its discretion in refusing to admit certain evidence in mitigation that the attorney sought to introduce pursuant to Part 6, § IV, Para. 13(I)(2)(f)(2) of the Rules of Court. The sanction order is reversed, the sanction is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings to consider and impose an appropriate sanction.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedVacatedRemanded
The court's record, as written
060558 Green v. Virginia State Bar 11/03/2006 In remanded proceedings concerning imposition of an appropriate sanction for an attorney's violation of Rules 1.3(a) and 8.4(b) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board did not err in conducting the proceedings via telephonic conference call, but abused its discretion in refusing to admit certain evidence in mitigation that the attorney sought to introduce pursuant to Part 6, § IV, Para. 13(I)(2)(f)(2) of the Rules of Court. The sanction order is reversed, the sanction is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings to consider and impose an appropriate sanction.
Outcome words in this text: remanded, reversed, vacated.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
