The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Harrell v. Harrell
No. 052629Supreme Court of Virginia
052629 Harrell v. Harrell 11/03/2006 In a divorce proceeding where each party made certain claims, the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's reservation of spousal support to a party who had no…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052629 Harrell v. Harrell 11/03/2006 In a divorce proceeding where each party made certain claims, the Court of Appeals erred in …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 3, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
052629 Harrell v. Harrell 11/03/2006 In a divorce proceeding where each party made certain claims, the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's reservation of spousal support to a party who had not lodged a valid pleading requesting it. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmed
The court's record, as written
052629 Harrell v. Harrell 11/03/2006 In a divorce proceeding where each party made certain claims, the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's reservation of spousal support to a party who had not lodged a valid pleading requesting it. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Outcome words in this text: affirming, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links