The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Cline v. Berg
No. 060237Supreme Court of Virginia
060237 Cline v. Berg 01/12/2007 In a suit for an injunction requiring removal of a 32-foot high, 200-foot long fence constructed of utility poles and plastic wrap which allegedly interfered unreasonably with p…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060237 Cline v. Berg 01/12/2007 In a suit for an injunction requiring removal of a 32-foot high, 200-foot long fence constructed …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
060237 Cline v. Berg 01/12/2007 In a suit for an injunction requiring removal of a 32-foot high, 200-foot long fence constructed of utility poles and plastic wrap which allegedly interfered unreasonably with plaintiff's use and enjoyment of his real property, the circuit court abused its discretion in granting injunctive relief to the plaintiff because it failed to apply the "clean hands" doctrine. For that reason, the circuit court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for the defendants.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedGranted
The court's record, as written
060237 Cline v. Berg 01/12/2007 In a suit for an injunction requiring removal of a 32-foot high, 200-foot long fence constructed of utility poles and plastic wrap which allegedly interfered unreasonably with plaintiff's use and enjoyment of his real property, the circuit court abused its discretion in granting injunctive relief to the plaintiff because it failed to apply the "clean hands" doctrine. For that reason, the circuit court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for the defendants.
Outcome words in this text: injunction, granting, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links