The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Almy v. Grisham
No. 052378Supreme Court of Virginia
052378 Almy v. Grisham 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) The trial court erred in dismissing a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress upon demurrer by several defendants, where the plaintiff had …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052378 Almy v. Grisham 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) The trial court erred in dismissing a claim for intentional infliction of …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
052378 Almy v. Grisham 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) The trial court erred in dismissing a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress upon demurrer by several defendants, where the plaintiff had alleged facts sufficient to satisfy the elements of such claim with respect to these defendants. However, a plaintiff may not assert a cause of action in Virginia for civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict severe emotional distress; thus, the trial court did not err in dismissing this claim with respect to all of the defendants. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedRemandedDismissed
The court's record, as written
052378 Almy v. Grisham 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) The trial court erred in dismissing a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress upon demurrer by several defendants, where the plaintiff had alleged facts sufficient to satisfy the elements of such claim with respect to these defendants. However, a plaintiff may not assert a cause of action in Virginia for civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict severe emotional distress; thus, the trial court did not err in dismissing this claim with respect to all of the defendants. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, affirmed, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links