The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
West v. Director, Dept. of Corrections
052263 West v. Director, Dept. of Corrections 01/12/2007 A writ of habeas corpus is granted on a claim for denial of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on the failure of petitio…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052263 West v. Director, Dept. of Corrections 01/12/2007 A writ of habeas corpus is granted on a claim for denial of the Sixth Am…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
052263 West v. Director, Dept. of Corrections 01/12/2007 A writ of habeas corpus is granted on a claim for denial of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on the failure of petitioner's trial attorney to raise a double jeopardy challenge to convictions of both aggravated involuntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter, and the "concurrent sentencing doctrine" is rejected as a basis for denying petitioner relief from the latter conviction. The petitioner's common law involuntary manslaughter conviction and sentence are vacated, and the remainder of the petition is dismissed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
VacatedDismissedGrantedDenied
The court's record, as written
052263 West v. Director, Dept. of Corrections 01/12/2007 A writ of habeas corpus is granted on a claim for denial of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on the failure of petitioner's trial attorney to raise a double jeopardy challenge to convictions of both aggravated involuntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter, and the "concurrent sentencing doctrine" is rejected as a basis for denying petitioner relief from the latter conviction. The petitioner's common law involuntary manslaughter conviction and sentence are vacated, and the remainder of the petition is dismissed.
Outcome words in this text: granted, denying, vacated, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
