The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Doe v. Terry
No. 052137Supreme Court of Virginia
052137 Doe v. Terry 01/12/2007 In a personal injury action, the circumstantial evidence adduced was insufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an unknown driver threw an object that stru…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052137 Doe v. Terry 01/12/2007 In a personal injury action, the circumstantial evidence adduced was insufficient to establish by …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
052137 Doe v. Terry 01/12/2007 In a personal injury action, the circumstantial evidence adduced was insufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an unknown driver threw an object that struck and injured plaintiff as he was performing maintenance work inside an interstate highway tunnel. Thus, there was insufficient evidence of John Doe's negligence to permit plaintiff to recover against the defendant insurer. The jury verdict in the plaintiff's favor is reversed and final judgment is entered in John Doe's favor.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
052137 Doe v. Terry 01/12/2007 In a personal injury action, the circumstantial evidence adduced was insufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an unknown driver threw an object that struck and injured plaintiff as he was performing maintenance work inside an interstate highway tunnel. Thus, there was insufficient evidence of John Doe's negligence to permit plaintiff to recover against the defendant insurer. The jury verdict in the plaintiff's favor is reversed and final judgment is entered in John Doe's favor.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links