The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Robinson v. Commonwealth
061911 Robinson v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 Applying the rule of strict construction of penal laws, the driver of a vehicle is "involved" in an accident triggering an obligation to remain at the scene and provi…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
061911 Robinson v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 Applying the rule of strict construction of penal laws, the driver of a vehicle is "in…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
061911 Robinson v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 Applying the rule of strict construction of penal laws, the driver of a vehicle is "involved" in an accident triggering an obligation to remain at the scene and provide information under Code § 46.2-894 only if there is physical contact between the driver's vehicle and another vehicle, person, or object, or if the defendant driver was a proximate cause of an accident. Since the present defendant's vehicle had no physical contact with that of the accident victim, and defendant was not a cause of the accident, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the conviction for violation of Code § 46.2-894 is dismissed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
061911 Robinson v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 Applying the rule of strict construction of penal laws, the driver of a vehicle is "involved" in an accident triggering an obligation to remain at the scene and provide information under Code § 46.2-894 only if there is physical contact between the driver's vehicle and another vehicle, person, or object, or if the defendant driver was a proximate cause of an accident. Since the present defendant's vehicle had no physical contact with that of the accident victim, and defendant was not a cause of the accident, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the conviction for violation of Code § 46.2-894 is dismissed.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
