The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park
061496 Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park 06/08/2007 (Revised 07/02/2007) In a corporate governance dispute presented on motions for summary judgment, the trial court erred in ruling that a majority of the d…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
061496 Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park 06/08/2007 (Revised 07/02/2007) In a corporate governance dispute presented on motion…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
061496 Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park 06/08/2007 (Revised 07/02/2007) In a corporate governance dispute presented on motions for summary judgment, the trial court erred in ruling that a majority of the directors of a Virginia nonstock corporation could not retire its debt by authorizing payment of outstanding debentures, but correctly ruled under Code § 13.1-842(D) and the language of a special meeting notice, that the members of record on the day before the effective date of the notice could vote at that meeting to remove all of the directors and elect an entirely new board. Aspects of summary judgment availability are also discussed. The judgment is reversed in part, affirmed in par…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmed
The court's record, as written
061496 Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park 06/08/2007 (Revised 07/02/2007) In a corporate governance dispute presented on motions for summary judgment, the trial court erred in ruling that a majority of the directors of a Virginia nonstock corporation could not retire its debt by authorizing payment of outstanding debentures, but correctly ruled under Code § 13.1-842(D) and the language of a special meeting notice, that the members of record on the day before the effective date of the notice could vote at that meeting to remove all of the directors and elect an entirely new board. Aspects of summary judgment availability are also discussed. The judgment is reversed in part, affirmed in par…
Outcome words in this text: reversed, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
