The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Haugen v. Shenandoah Valley Dept. of Social Services
No. 060869Supreme Court of Virginia
060869 Haugen v. Shenandoah Valley Dept. of Social Services 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) The Court of Appeals of Virginia did not err in ruling that a transcript or statement of facts was necessary in an ap…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060869 Haugen v. Shenandoah Valley Dept. of Social Services 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) The Court of Appeals of Virginia did …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
060869 Haugen v. Shenandoah Valley Dept. of Social Services 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) The Court of Appeals of Virginia did not err in ruling that a transcript or statement of facts was necessary in an appeal asserting that the circuit court erred by refusing to require an incarcerated parent's presence during a hearing to terminate her parental rights. However, the present record is sufficient to show that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to grant a continuance to that parent, who participated by telephone, when federal prison officials terminated her participation before the evidence was completed. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
060869 Haugen v. Shenandoah Valley Dept. of Social Services 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) The Court of Appeals of Virginia did not err in ruling that a transcript or statement of facts was necessary in an appeal asserting that the circuit court erred by refusing to require an incarcerated parent's presence during a hearing to terminate her parental rights. However, the present record is sufficient to show that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to grant a continuance to that parent, who participated by telephone, when federal prison officials terminated her participation before the evidence was completed. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links