The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Shelton v. Commonwealth
060280 Shelton v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) In a proceeding under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, an inmate properly preserved the argument that his score on a test d…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060280 Shelton v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) In a proceeding under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Pre…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
060280 Shelton v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) In a proceeding under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, an inmate properly preserved the argument that his score on a test designed to predict sex offender recidivism fell below the minimum qualifying an inmate for further evaluation under the Act, and the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss under then-applicable Code provisions. Undisputed evidence showed that the correctly computed score on the risk assessment instrument was lower than the minimum required by the statute. The circuit court's judgment is reversed and the Commonwealth's petition is dismissed with prejudice.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissedDenied
The court's record, as written
060280 Shelton v. Commonwealth 06/08/2007 (Revised 02/08/2008) In a proceeding under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, an inmate properly preserved the argument that his score on a test designed to predict sex offender recidivism fell below the minimum qualifying an inmate for further evaluation under the Act, and the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss under then-applicable Code provisions. Undisputed evidence showed that the correctly computed score on the risk assessment instrument was lower than the minimum required by the statute. The circuit court's judgment is reversed and the Commonwealth's petition is dismissed with prejudice.
Outcome words in this text: denying, reversed, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
