The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Miles v. Commonwealth (ORDER)
No. 052568Supreme Court of Virginia
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 06/08/2007 Upon considering the Commonwealth's petition for rehearing regarding the prior decision of this appeal reported in Miles v. Commonwealth, 272 Va. 302, 634 S.E.2d…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 06/08/2007 Upon considering the Commonwealth's petition for rehearing regarding the prior de…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 06/08/2007 Upon considering the Commonwealth's petition for rehearing regarding the prior decision of this appeal reported in Miles v. Commonwealth, 272 Va. 302, 634 S.E.2d 330 (2007), the Court is of the opinion that its judgment reversing the judgment of the circuit court should not be set aside and should stand as issued. Accordingly, the Commonwealth's petition requesting that the defendant be classified as a sexually violent predator and subjected to civil commitment under the Sexually Violent Predators Act is dismissed with prejudice. See Record #052568, Miles v. Commonwealth, dated September 15, 2006
Open court document ↗Docket entry
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth 09/15/2006 When strictly construed, the provisions of Code § 37.2-903(C), a part of the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, Code §§ 37.2-900 through -919, require that an inmate evaluated with a designated testing instrument receive, as a condition precedent, a particular numerical score in order for the Commonwealth to initiate proceedings to have him declared a sexually violent predator under the Act. The judgment is reversed and the Commonwealth's petition is dismissed with prejudice. See Record No. 052568, Miles v. Commonwealth (Order) dated June 8, 2007
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
2 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth 09/15/2006 When strictly construed, the provisions of Code § 37.2-903(C), a part of the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, Code §§ 37.2-900 through -919, require that an inmate evaluated with a designated testing instrument receive, as a condition precedent, a particular numerical score in order for the Commonwealth to initiate proceedings to have him declared a sexually violent predator under the Act. The judgment is reversed and the Commonwealth's petition is dismissed with prejudice. See Record No. 052568, Miles v. Commonwealth (Order) dated June 8, 2007
Outcome words in this text: reversed, dismissed.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
052568 Miles v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 06/08/2007 Upon considering the Commonwealth's petition for rehearing regarding the prior decision of this appeal reported in Miles v. Commonwealth, 272 Va. 302, 634 S.E.2d 330 (2007), the Court is of the opinion that its judgment reversing the judgment of the circuit court should not be set aside and should stand as issued. Accordingly, the Commonwealth's petition requesting that the defendant be classified as a sexually violent predator and subjected to civil commitment under the Sexually Violent Predators Act is dismissed with prejudice. See Record #052568, Miles v. Commonwealth, dated September 15, 2006
Outcome words in this text: reversing, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links