The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Fancher v. Fagella
062339 Fancher v. Fagella 09/14/2007 Injunctive relief is available under Virginia law to compel an adjoining landowner to remove a tree, the roots of which intrude into and cause significant, continuous and i…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
062339 Fancher v. Fagella 09/14/2007 Injunctive relief is available under Virginia law to compel an adjoining landowner to remove…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 14, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
062339 Fancher v. Fagella 09/14/2007 Injunctive relief is available under Virginia law to compel an adjoining landowner to remove a tree, the roots of which intrude into and cause significant, continuous and increasing structural damage to the plaintiff's property. The prior decision in Smith v. Holt, 174 Va. 213, 5 S.E.2d 492 (1939), is overruled insofar as it conditions a right of action upon the "noxious" nature of such a plant. Factors to be considered in fashioning an appropriate remedy in such cases are discussed. The circuit court's order denying injunctive relief is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDenied
The court's record, as written
062339 Fancher v. Fagella 09/14/2007 Injunctive relief is available under Virginia law to compel an adjoining landowner to remove a tree, the roots of which intrude into and cause significant, continuous and increasing structural damage to the plaintiff's property. The prior decision in Smith v. Holt, 174 Va. 213, 5 S.E.2d 492 (1939), is overruled insofar as it conditions a right of action upon the "noxious" nature of such a plant. Factors to be considered in fashioning an appropriate remedy in such cases are discussed. The circuit court's order denying injunctive relief is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: denying, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
