The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
West Square, L.L.C. v. Communication Technologies
062303 West Square, L.L.C. v. Communication Technologies 09/14/2007 (Revised 09/24/2007) In litigation concerning whether a commercial lease with an attorneys' fee and cost recovery provision had been breached…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
062303 West Square, L.L.C. v. Communication Technologies 09/14/2007 (Revised 09/24/2007) In litigation concerning whether a comme…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 14, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
062303 West Square, L.L.C. v. Communication Technologies 09/14/2007 (Revised 09/24/2007) In litigation concerning whether a commercial lease with an attorneys' fee and cost recovery provision had been breached, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees to award to the landlord as the prevailing party was less than the amount claimed, but did abuse its discretion by refusing to award certain claimed costs and expenses. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and because the tenant is the prevailing party on appeal, the case is remanded to the circuit court for a determination of reasonable attorneys' fees, costs…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
062303 West Square, L.L.C. v. Communication Technologies 09/14/2007 (Revised 09/24/2007) In litigation concerning whether a commercial lease with an attorneys' fee and cost recovery provision had been breached, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees to award to the landlord as the prevailing party was less than the amount claimed, but did abuse its discretion by refusing to award certain claimed costs and expenses. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and because the tenant is the prevailing party on appeal, the case is remanded to the circuit court for a determination of reasonable attorneys' fees, costs…
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
