The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Jennings v. Kay Jennings Ltd. Partnership
070498 Jennings v. Kay Jennings Ltd. Partnership 04/18/2008 In a derivative suit brought by a limited partner of a family limited partnership, the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff lacked standing…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
070498 Jennings v. Kay Jennings Ltd. Partnership 04/18/2008 In a derivative suit brought by a limited partner of a family limited…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 18, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
070498 Jennings v. Kay Jennings Ltd. Partnership 04/18/2008 In a derivative suit brought by a limited partner of a family limited partnership, the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring the action under Code § 50-73.62. His economic interests as landlord and lessee of certain real property managed by the partnership were in direct conflict with the partnership's interests, and under the circumstances he could not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the other partners and the partnership. The trial court's judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for an award of attorney's fees incurred on appeal pursuant to Code § 50-73.65.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
070498 Jennings v. Kay Jennings Ltd. Partnership 04/18/2008 In a derivative suit brought by a limited partner of a family limited partnership, the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring the action under Code § 50-73.62. His economic interests as landlord and lessee of certain real property managed by the partnership were in direct conflict with the partnership's interests, and under the circumstances he could not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the other partners and the partnership. The trial court's judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for an award of attorney's fees incurred on appeal pursuant to Code § 50-73.65.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
