The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Andrews v. Browne
071079 Andrews v. Browne 06/06/2008 (Revised 02/26/2009) In a case charging securities law violations in the sale of a closely-held corporation, the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment and i…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
071079 Andrews v. Browne 06/06/2008 (Revised 02/26/2009) In a case charging securities law violations in the sale of a closely-he…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 6, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
071079 Andrews v. Browne 06/06/2008 (Revised 02/26/2009) In a case charging securities law violations in the sale of a closely-held corporation, the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment and in dismissing a claim brought against the defendant sellers for making untrue statements of material fact and omitting material facts in the sale of a security under Code § 13.1-522. If an instrument bears the label "stock" and possesses the characteristics typically associated with stock, it is a "security" within the meaning of the Virginia Securities Act, Code § 13.1-501 et seq. Therefore, a transaction in which 100% of the stock of a closely held corporation possessing such characte…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
DismissedGranted
The court's record, as written
071079 Andrews v. Browne 06/06/2008 (Revised 02/26/2009) In a case charging securities law violations in the sale of a closely-held corporation, the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment and in dismissing a claim brought against the defendant sellers for making untrue statements of material fact and omitting material facts in the sale of a security under Code § 13.1-522. If an instrument bears the label "stock" and possesses the characteristics typically associated with stock, it is a "security" within the meaning of the Virginia Securities Act, Code § 13.1-501 et seq. Therefore, a transaction in which 100% of the stock of a closely held corporation possessing such characte…
Outcome words in this text: granting, dismissing.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
