The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Palace Laundry, Inc. v. Chesterfield County
071920 Palace Laundry, Inc. v. Chesterfield County 09/12/2008 Because cleaning and maintaining its rental property does not transform a rental business into a processing business, the circuit court did not err…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
071920 Palace Laundry, Inc. v. Chesterfield County 09/12/2008 Because cleaning and maintaining its rental property does not trans…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 12, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
071920 Palace Laundry, Inc. v. Chesterfield County 09/12/2008 Because cleaning and maintaining its rental property does not transform a rental business into a processing business, the circuit court did not err in finding that a linen rental company that cleans only its own linens is not a processing business for personal property tax purposes under Code § 58.1-3507(A). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
071920 Palace Laundry, Inc. v. Chesterfield County 09/12/2008 Because cleaning and maintaining its rental property does not transform a rental business into a processing business, the circuit court did not err in finding that a linen rental company that cleans only its own linens is not a processing business for personal property tax purposes under Code § 58.1-3507(A). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
