The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
West Creek Associates v. County of Goochland
071411 West Creek Associates v. County of Goochland 09/12/2008 In an appeal involving applications for relief from the allegedly erroneous assessment of real property taxes on multiple parcels of real estate s…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
071411 West Creek Associates v. County of Goochland 09/12/2008 In an appeal involving applications for relief from the allegedly …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 12, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
071411 West Creek Associates v. County of Goochland 09/12/2008 In an appeal involving applications for relief from the allegedly erroneous assessment of real property taxes on multiple parcels of real estate situated in a business park, the circuit court erred by holding that, in order to show manifest error, a taxpayer must prove what information the taxing authority considered and how it arrived at the challenged assessments. However, the circuit court correctly ruled that the taxpayers failed to present credible evidence of fair market value with regard to certain parcels. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
071411 West Creek Associates v. County of Goochland 09/12/2008 In an appeal involving applications for relief from the allegedly erroneous assessment of real property taxes on multiple parcels of real estate situated in a business park, the circuit court erred by holding that, in order to show manifest error, a taxpayer must prove what information the taxing authority considered and how it arrived at the challenged assessments. However, the circuit court correctly ruled that the taxpayers failed to present credible evidence of fair market value with regard to certain parcels. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
