The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Vincent v. Commonwealth
No. 072539Supreme Court of Virginia
072539 Vincent v. Commonwealth 10/31/2008 In a prosecution for breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-91, the evidence and available inferences were insufficient to…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
072539 Vincent v. Commonwealth 10/31/2008 In a prosecution for breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny in violati…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- October 31, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
072539 Vincent v. Commonwealth 10/31/2008 In a prosecution for breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-91, the evidence and available inferences were insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had the intent to commit larceny when he broke into and entered a retail department store. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding the conviction is reversed and the indictment is dismissed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedDismissed
The court's record, as written
072539 Vincent v. Commonwealth 10/31/2008 In a prosecution for breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-91, the evidence and available inferences were insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had the intent to commit larceny when he broke into and entered a retail department store. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding the conviction is reversed and the indictment is dismissed.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links