The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Jackson v. Qureshi
No. 080502Supreme Court of Virginia
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffered medical expert witness met the statutory "knowledge" and "active clinical pra…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffer…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 16, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffered medical expert witness met the statutory "knowledge" and "active clinical practice" requirements under Code § 8.01-581.20 to testify with regard to the medical procedure at issue, the circuit court's judgment dismissing the case with prejudice after finding that the expert could not testify is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDismissed
The court's record, as written
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffered medical expert witness met the statutory "knowledge" and "active clinical practice" requirements under Code § 8.01-581.20 to testify with regard to the medical procedure at issue, the circuit court's judgment dismissing the case with prejudice after finding that the expert could not testify is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links